Subscribe now to get notified about IU Jharkhand journal updates!
This paper aims to explore the time allocation of working women and how they distribute their limited time (24hrs) resource for different activities per day. It gives information about when and where an activity takes place, how it is organized etc., all of which have significant policy implications. Here time allocation for domestic/household work is one of the major arenas have been highlighted as it consumes a huge portion of working women's time, and the value of domestic work performed by working women are also calculated. Basically working women spend about 7 hours per day for domestic work and the value of their HH work is about 941.54 rupees per day as revealed from the empirical study. This study is confined to Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation; hence no macro level inferences can be made from this.
Time is frequently more valuable than money and it is
regarded as a common and accepted concept. Gronau
(1977) 'Compares Wife's time to an iceberg, the visible top
shows the time she spends in the market but the
submerged part is just like the amount of time she spends
at home'. Women's position to development is often under
predictable and under reported with the usual instrument
of census, and time-use-surveys truly and exactly pictures
women's social and economic contribution to the family,
society and for the whole nation. Even though since
ancient times GDP per capita is accepted as measure of
welfare of the economy, but really how individuals earn
income, how much time they spend on paid work, how
much stress strain they face while combining paid market
work and unpaid domestic work, how much leisure they
gain, all these are to be considered as important indicators
to examine the quality of life of the individuals. Along
with the paid market work, women especially WW has to
spend their time on so many domestic activities including
cooking, cleaning, washing, caring etc. and the list goes
endless. Rather than adopting the usual GDP estimator to
calculate the growth of the economy, indicators of
sustainable growth which considers the value of
household services along with other variable is also
necessary in the real world. Such a genuine indicator is
GPI (Genuine Progress Indicator) for sustainable
development. The invisible economy is mainly
concentrated by a woman who performs the unpaid work
which mainly contributed to the emotional and physical
development of every family and in fact they are building
up the human capital of every nation. Governments
should take measures to assign a monetary value to the
Gayatri Nayak1 S.K. Padhi2
unpaid work performed by women. Household satellite
accounts and time use surveys help to give visibility to
their work (Ramya (2013).
Bianchi (2010) categorizes parent's time into paid work,
housework and child care. Such a categorization is also
undertaken here. While investigating care work given for
old, friends, adult and children are also considered in her
analysis. On the basis of the empirical data collected over
the last decade in US made it clear that despite rapid
increase in maternal employment, mother's investment in
child rearing remains very high and another significant
finding is that once a working woman had a child, her time
dedicated to domestic work shows a sharp increase.
Souse-poza et al. (2000) explained that men's allocation of
time to housework and child-care is mostly invariant to
changes in socio-economic factors. Women's allocation of
time to housework and child-care is shown to depend on
several social, economic and demographic factors. It is
deliberate with two market alternate cost methods and
three opportunity cost method. The result shows that the
value of time assigned to housework and child-care ranges
from 27% to 39% and from 5% to 8% of GDP in (1997)
respectively.
Malathy (1994) made an estimation of the allocation to
non-market work of urban women in Madras with the
goal of examining the responsiveness of non-market time
allocations to economic incentives, namely wages and
income, and to appreciate the role of education on time
allocation. The importance of this study stems from the
fact that 'housework is an important activity for women,
mainly in the developing countries, and ignoring this
element of time use can criticallywarp our dimension of
their productive role' (p.744). Based on the structure of
analysis of the new HH economics approach, the study
found out that an increase in wife's wage is expected to
have a negative effect on non-market time allocation. An
increase in the husband's salary exerts an income effect
which is negative. The study shows a replacement
opposite relationship between the spouses' time (p.745).
Wales and Woodland (1977) presents a model of HH in
which time is allocated between job work, leisure and
housework. Leisure is in fact a function of wage rate of
husband, wife, and price of Hicksian composite good, full
income. When housework hours are treated as
endogenous, as income increases, demand for big house,
to perform HH duties more labour saving devices arise. To
examine the working hours of each spouse, wage rate non
labour income and socio-economic factors are taken as
illustrative variables. Results of these studies are used to
conclude the extent to which work effort of the husband or
wife that change as a result of the changes in the wage rate
of each spouse.
Quentin et al. (2010) in their study conducted in Sierra
Leone revealed that if women allocate more time on
domestic tasks, it will negatively affect their economic
opportunities. Under such position instead of sharing
domestic tasks HH may demand the services of paid
domestic workers. Time allocation model incorporating
domestic workers and occupation wise time use between
the farmers and hiring of paid domestic work is
undertaken by Yang et al. (2004). In a dual earner
household, time constraint is so willingly felt which cover
the way for an increasing demand for domestic workers.
The stress and strain faced by WW in their time allocation
lead to a sharp increase in the demand for domestic
workers. Talking from the side of substitutability, if
domestic work performed by woman herself and work
performed by the domestic workers are perfect
substitutes, working women will begin to hire their
services when their market wage is greater than the hired
service of the domestic worker.
In the view of the above stated studies, the objective is to
examine a detailed sketch of 'time allocation of WW and
value of the domestic work across different occupations'.
Hypothesis
In the present study we hypothesize that, there are
significant differences in the time allocation behaviour of
working women based on their occupation and nature of
work.
Working women refers to those women's were work
outside the home for wages or where the women are
working in the labour market for wages/salaries. The data
were collected from 200 WW households using purposive
sampling and a questionnaire structured to throw light
into the time allocation of WW, in organized sector of
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC) area. BMC
records the highest participation of women in the
organized labour market, literacy rate, predominance of
service sector etc. and Bhubaneswar is the capital of
Odisha which can be seen as a representative of state, and
BMC is mostly urban in nature. About 87% in the sample
women are married and remain 8.5% are widow and 4.5%
are unmarried. All WW of the sample belongs to age
between 25 to 60 years old. In the present study examine
the different related work and its significance upon the
time allocation of WW is presented. One way ANOVA is
used to compare the different related work time allocation
of WW with different occupational status.
As the present study being a comparative study based on
different occupational categories. All the occupations are
categorized in 8 different classes for easy understanding,
that 1st group which consists 22% teaching professional
(teacher, lecturer, professor etc.), 2nd group consists 9.5%
medical staffs (doctor, nurse, and dietician), 3rd group
consists 7.5% senior officials & managers (senior officers,
deputy director, director, statistical officer, manager, etc.),
4th group consists 16.5% engineer (technician, hardware
and software engineer etc.), 5th group consists 8.5% media,
protection and legal services (mass media, police, lawyer,
and legal officers etc.), 6th group consists 19% clerk and
related worker (all clerical, office assistant, section officer
etc.), 7th group consists 12% receptionist and airport jobs
(receptionist, airhostess, flight attendant etc.), and 8th
group consists 5% peon and home-guard (all class-4 staff).
Table.1 Occupational distributions of Simple respendents
Occupation | Frequency | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Teaching Professional | 44 | 22 |
2 | Medical Staff | 19 | 9.5 |
3 | Senior Officials and Manager | 13 | 16.5 |
4 | Engineer | 15 | 7.5 |
5 | Media Protection and Legal Services | 17 | 8.5 |
6 | Clerk and reletad Work | 38 | 19 |
7 | Receptionist & airport job | 24 | 12 |
8 | peon & Home-guard | 10 | 05 |
Total | 200 | 100 | |
Working hours are one of the important factors which effect employee's motivation. Mainly the time use patterns of individuals differ in week days, holidays, in the event of abnormalities, in days such as celebration of festivals, arrival of guests. Such abnormal days were not considered for the study and the respondents were asked to state the time that they spent on various activities in normal days. So focus is given mainly on normal working days and time allocation of WW across different occupational categories in the concerned days is undertaken. Total time allocation, time allocation of domestic work and time devoted to personal care, elderly care, rest and leisure activities are presented. Along with the time allocation details, the value of domestic work performed by WW are also calculated.
The Table-2 explains the usual working hours of WW at
working place by different occupation. Regarding to this
out of the total majority group (49%) are working 8hrs on
their occupation, followed by 7 hour (30%).
Table.2 Occupational distributions of Simple respendents
Occupation | Working Hour in working place (in hours perday) | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 Hrs | 6 Hrs | 7 Hrs | 8 Hrs | 9 Hrs | 10 Hrs | Above 10(14 Hrs) | ||||
1 | Teaching Profissionals | 4 | 19 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | |
2 | Medical Staff | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 19 | |
3 | Senior Officials & Managers | 0 | 0 | 7 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 31 | |
4 | Engineer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | |
5 | Media Protection & Legal Services | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | |
6 | Clerk and reletad Worker | 0 | 1 | 14 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 38 | |
7 | Receptionist & airport job | 0 | 0 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | |
8 | Peon & Home-Guard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
This section related with how a WW allocates her 24 hours
on different activities. Time spend at work place have a
significant control upon her other activities within the
family. For easy understanding, time allocation to total
time is classified into five categories: i) Time at work place',
which includes only that time which is spending in
working place for paid market work, ii) Time for HH work,
which includes cooking, cleaning, washing, child care,
elderly care, HH management and other related work etc.
iii) Sleeping and resting time, iv) Transportation time,
which is including that time which is spend by WW for
travel working place to residence and v) Other personal
related work, which is includes reading books and
newspaper, walking, talking, hobbies, project work,
preparing for promotion etc.
The Table-3 revealed that, 5th group employees WW spend
comparatively more time at work place, nearly 9.06 hours
per day, and 1st occupational group WW spend relatively
less time at the work place, nearly 6.39 hours per day. On an
average WW are spent 7.85 hours per day for their working
place. Teaching profession's WW have highest time
allocation for domestic work, nearly 7.65 hours per day and
the engineer professional have the lowest time spend for
domestic work, nearly 5.65 hours per day. On an average
WW are spending 6.58 hours per day for domestic work.
Sleep is in fact a major expenditure of time that exhibits
important disparity within every population. Sleep will
definitely add to an individual's efficiency and it is clear
that sleeps increases efficiency and through this is helps to
maximize money income (Becker, 1965). Turning to time
allocation for sleeping and resting time on an average WW
have spent 7.31 hours per day. For transportation time, on
an average WW spend 0.69 hours per day because of long
distance between working place to their residence (home
On averages WW have getting rest 1.62 hours' time per
day for other personal related worked, and also found that
engineers are spend more time and 8th occupational group
employees are spend less time for this. As F value is found
to be highly significant for all factors expect other personal
related work.
How much proportion of total time is devoted to different
activities is also very important while examining the time
allocation of WW. When taking on an average, it is
revealed that WW are spent 32.71% of their total time for
market work, 27.41% for household work, 30.45% for
sleeping and resting, 2.89% for transportation and nearly
6.74% for other personal related work. Both the work
taken together, that is market work and unpaid household
work comes more than 60% for their time and balance less
than 40% for other's (sleeping, resting, travailing etc.).
Time allocation to total household work is further
classified into mainly three: Time devoted to (a) main
household work (which is also divided into two different
parts, like i.) cooking and ii) washing & cleaning), (b) care
time (which include child care, elderly care) and (c)
household management (which include paying bills,
shopping, water collection, domestic outsourcing,
gardening etc.). The values presented in the table 4.17 are
average or mean value of time in hours per day.
An occupation wise assessment of domestic time
allocation reveals that there exists significant difference
between different occupational categories in their total
domestic time allocation that is time devoted for
household work. Table-5 revealed that most of the time
used for main household work (2.15+0.96=3.11 hours per
day), followed by care time (especially child care) and less
time for others, because for time poverty for household
work. Another interesting result found that WW are spend
less time for washing and cleaning because substitute
using of washing machine, dish washer, vacuum cleaner
and domestic maid helper
While examining child care and related aspects major time use studies are focused on parent's time use for example, Neuwirth (2004) made estimation on parent's caring activities and mother's market working time and time for child care is discussed. Parents with young children came under high time pressure and how that time pressure is varied across occupation is not considered in many studies; here a clear focus is maintained only on women especially WW. Human development report (1995) exposed that 'once a woman has child she is expected to spend about 3.3 more hours per day on unpaid activities and a women with children below 5 year is expected to put 9.6 hours of total work every day for child care'. For analysis the total child care provided by women, here only who have young child (0-15 years) is considered and it is divided into three type of care;
The F value reveals that there is no significant difference between different occupational groups in providing child care, as it is clear that women whatever be their occupational status they spends almost parallel time for child care. On an average WW have spent less time for educational child care (0.52 hours per day), because they must have time poverty, with also because of, they appoint an alternate private teacher to look after their children's educational needs. Table-6 reveals that WW have spent 2.73 hours per day for total child care.
It is found from the Table-7, that the F value is significant
in case of total personal care, in the case with teaching and
medical professionals (0.81 and 0.74 hours per day
respectively) who spend some what a little bit time more
than other occupational categories. It also reveals that
there is no significant difference between occupational
groups in the time devoted to health care (physical
exercise). On an average working woman spend very less
time for personal health care or physical exercise (0.22
hours per day).
India is the 2nd populated country in the world, around 104 million elderly persons which is 8.6% of the population (census of India, 2011). Table-8 reveals that among different occupational categories no significant difference in time allocation for elderly care can be noticed. Taking all together WW spend only 0.18 hours per day for elderly care, which is very negligible.
Thus GDP is not a better method of calculating the level of
economic activities; a GPI can be obtained through
household settlement accounts. GPI supplements GDP
and it represents the accurate cost and can be used as a tool
of sustainable development. The important feature of GPI
is that along with other factors the unpaid domestic
activities promotes the welfare of every economy which
are mainly performed by women is also take into kindness
and on the basis of GPI calculation an average Indian house
wife adds Rs.78000 per year to the economy (Indian
Economy Review, 2011).
With the help of time use surveys the economic value of
domestic work is calculated and if these unpaid activities
are properly recognized, it will become very easy for the
policy framers to frame suitable policies. But illogically all
such domestic work is classified as 'economically
unproductive' and the WW's true work is thus
economically undervalued. Here an attempt is thus made
to calculate the value of domestic work performed by WW
across different occupations. The formula is:
Value of domestic work performed by women = Average
time spend for domestic work per day × Average salary
per hour (equivalent to the salary position of each
occupational category).
On the basis of the formula, the 1st teaching occupational
spend on an average 6.39 hours per day at the work place,
their average salary per day can also been gained from
their monthly salary. From that it is possible to find out
their average salary per hour. The sample survey also gives
the data on an average time spend for domestic work and
when their average salary is multiplied by the average time
they spend for domestic work, their value of domestic
work can be calculated. The 1st teaching occupational
category on an average spend about 7.65% hours per day
on domestic work and the value of domestic work per day
is 1425.41 rupees.
Similarly for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th 5th, 6th, 7th and 8thoccupational
groups spend 6.13, 6.35, 5.65, 6.27, 7.0, 7.0 and 6.57 hours
respectively per day for domestic work and its value is
about Rs.1156.88, Rs.1599.04, Rs.762.14, Rs.774.83,
Rs.866.43, Rs.499.14 and Rs.458.53 rupees per day. Taking
all together WW spend about 6.58hours per day for
domestic work and the value of their HH work is about
941.54 rupees per day.
Conclusion
Time allocation survey and quantification of HH domestic
work will become very easy for the policy framers to frame
suitable policies for the improvement of not only WW but
also improve the conditions of home makers, and also
apply sustainable tools to calculate the correct sustainable
growth of our state.
Reference